First and foremost was going to write the article, but the Red Cross is a kind of force, which I pay my wife, Rosa. I mean they got what he says, and now leave alone, it is old business, and the Red Cross in the sleeve man has saved the lives of fifteen people, in what is considered a war zone. You can not get anything better than that.
Comes the question: was the Red Cross emblem used with improper intentions?
Perhaps, and I’m sure it’s not the first time that happens, but it seems as if you got some professionals there without much sympathy, even in high offices that can not be put to rest. They say look at the future of the Red Cross! It hurts the potential to help others. The media, including the Red Cross more damage than ever had intended to Colombia to do, if in fact they have the intention to use the logo at all in the first place.
President of the Republic of Colombia, killed his father with these terrorists, and the man who wore the badge arm trying to make this point of their mission and the mission at the international level and supports the Red Cross, I did what most people would have done, had been placed in such a position. But now these people are the so-called good even in the high offices of the Red Cross, it is called a war crime.
First and foremost praise Colombia for such a daring feat, secondly, that the terrorist got what you deserve, the third, is Colombian President Alvaro Uribe my hero now; forth, and not Ainerk, suppose to be helping patients? These hostages fifteen they were not birds healthiest in Colombia, and those people making noise more, I bet they eat breakfast fat, and had eight hours of sleep is glorious, so they got to get off their horses high and look at what has been achieved. They really need to look at it from a different perspective: one of these hostages, the mother, father, child, husband, wife, it will provide a large wrench over spilled milk? I do not think so, and if they are, I do not want them in my family circle.
From another point of view, if this was the man who wore the logo saved your son’s life, or the life or family life of the mission, and what then? Red Cross is saying, he needs to quit this slogan, and I say “come and kill all of us now?” Because we are deceiving the people you
I saw that happen, when will send the United States in a helicopter to rescue their team in Africa for years, because it violated the protocol, and now and then I wonder how their families to think of it; when he was a simple task, because these helicopters were close. It asked the United States to do so, and said that the United States, if we do that, you people will insult us internationally, again violating your standards, where people cried and cried over the phone, as they got slaughtered, cut into parts and pieces with machetes liabilities Black.
In conclusion, let me say this, right or wrong, and every law has exceptions to this policy, depending on the circumstances, we are not robots. If we confine ourselves to these standards, we become limited not only in the war, and even save lives. After the end of the conflict, or after they are winning the war, no one is asking, especially the losers, “Did you fight taxi?” Winning means life or death, and remember all of us only have one.